As per
McGregor’s theorizing, there are two diametrically different types of people at
work which he recognized as Theory X and Theory Y (Lawter et al, 2015).
The Theory
X discusses that the people are often averse to working and are lacking
ambition and responsibility towards their job roles, thereby requiring close
supervision and rigid controls to prevent the passiveness of employees (Gannon
and Boguszak, 2013).
This incapacity of employees would lead the management to provide detailed instructions and to reduce the scope of work assigned to each employee to match their limited capabilities. As such, McGregor (1957) identified the aforesaid as the most pessimistic view of human nature which needs continuous supervision to get a job done.
This incapacity of employees would lead the management to provide detailed instructions and to reduce the scope of work assigned to each employee to match their limited capabilities. As such, McGregor (1957) identified the aforesaid as the most pessimistic view of human nature which needs continuous supervision to get a job done.
In
contradiction to the Theory X, McGregor proposed an alternative approach which
is identified as Theory Y, where it assumes that people are not passive and in
fact the organizational objectives can be achieved in a more fruitful manner with
the right direction and provision of opportunities by the management (Gannon
and Boguszak, 2013).
Theory Y assumes that a) people can find work enjoyable provided, the work environment and conditions are suitable, b) people are capable of self- direction and self-control and c) people possess the ability of intellectual contribution towards their job roles (McGregor 1960).
Theory Y assumes that a) people can find work enjoyable provided, the work environment and conditions are suitable, b) people are capable of self- direction and self-control and c) people possess the ability of intellectual contribution towards their job roles (McGregor 1960).
DeCamp
(1992) emphasizes that the causes for high employee turnover ratio in most of
the organizations are mainly due to the failures in their recruitment processes
as they are keen on verifying the compatibility of the candidate only with the
interviewer and not with the actual people they get to work with. Further,
DeCamp (1992) discusses that the interviewers should select Y type employees
for managerial positions to ensure that the lower level staff are motivated and
always achieve the set targets.
In
this connection, I observe that the company I work for, always give preference
for applicants who have the qualities of theory Y for all managerial positions.
This is due to the increased level of responsibility, encouragement, successful
delegation of authority which would be observed from their staff. However, for certain job roles such as call
centre executives, front line officers and back office functions, company would
even consider candidates who possess characteristics similar to Theory X,
considering the limitation of job profiles and costs.
References
DeCamp
and Donald, D (1992). "Are you
hiring the right people?" Management Review, vol. 81, no. 5
Gannon,
D and Boguszak, A, (2013). Douglas McGregor’s Theory X And Theory Y, CRIS
Bulletin 2013/02.
Lawter,
L., Kopelman, R. and Prottas, D., (2015). McGregor's theory X/Y and job
performance: A multilevel, multi-source analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues
McGregor,
D. M (1957). “Human Side of Enterprise.” Management Review 46: 622-628
McGregor,
D. M (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Agreed Jinesh. In the other hand as Breaugh & Starke (2000) presented a large number of potential organizational goals that recruiters could strive to reach from shortening recruiting processing to reducing turnover.
ReplyDelete